State v. Mann

-
John Mann was charged 10 dollars for shooting a slave in the back the state argued that slavery is unpleasant ,intent was to kill, damages should be there for the owner, in 481 Ad Justinian empire set an early precedent that it is illegal to harm slaves and in 1256 ad with Spanish law. The state demanded compensation for the actions of John Mann. John Mann damaged loaned property and that is wrong. The bible says good treatment of a slave is required and John Mann caused deliberate harm, he rendered the property worthless.

 The attorneys on the side of John Mann argued that slaves are declared runaways you can kill them or cause harm to them, which is what John did. They argued that he can not be charged assault on property, the argued that slavery is never condemned in the bible. Since he owned the slave for one year he can treat her as he wanted. They argued saying that the amount of the fine is too high and that he didn't kill anyone he only wounded the slave.

The judge of today's trial made his ruling on the side of John Mann. Reasoning behind it is that since North Carolina is still a slave state it is completely legal for what John Mann did.

 State v. Mann

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Town hall on Slavery

-
Image
  Henry Clay was known as the great compromiser. Henry Clay had a way to drive the public insane. Henry Clay created a compromise known as the Missouri compromise. This compromise allowed Missouri to enter in as a slave state and allow Maine to enter in as a free state. This was supposed keep the balance between slave and free state. Henry Clay started bounty hunting. Henry Clay was trying to faze out slavery. Let it happen over time to keep the South from falling. In 1833 he solved the problems he created, Henry Clay owned 60 slaves but released them before his death. Henry Clay paid for all of his slaves education. He tried to make everything better.              
Read more

Board of Regents of California v. Bakke

-
Image
 May it Please the Court:  Good Morning ladies and gentlemen, your honor  Today I stand before you to say that the actions of Allan P. Bakke are not acceptable. This man is trying to argue that he should get a seat in UC Davis School of Medicine and this is just not right. This man was rejected not because he was not smart of enough or because he was white, he was rejected because of his age. The state of California has a diversity quota, this is set in place to allow minorities access to education. Even if this was about race the school is still in the right because of affirmative action. Affirmative Action allows schools to factor race into their admittance decision. There is no denying that Bakke is smart, but he was rejected by more than one school`, your honor if you rule in favor of Mr. Bakke you would be allowing people who get rejected to try and sue in court to get their way. This would set a precedent that would show if you do not get your way then you can sue in the court o
Read more

Reconstruction Video

-
Image
 After watching the video on reconstruction it really opened my eyes to how not that long ago it was. Just in 2015, a kid walked into a predominantly black church said a prayer and opened fire in the middle of the church causing harm to nine victims. This issue goes back years to a time period we call reconstruction. Reconstruction was a time in which we got rid of the old ways and tried to create new ways. In these ways it caused the old whites to be angry with the new way. It caused tension between the old lights and the new lights.  The African American culture was under attack, the old whites were trying to erase everything that has happened. There were many different attempts and different events that have occurred to harm the African American group.  
Read more